(from Caracas with love)
Quincy Saul, November 8, 2016
There is no alternative, only the election. Pig
versus lizard. Racist clown versus sophisticated assassin. White
supremacy versus world domination. Dirty old man versus heartless old
woman. Lecher versus sadist. The Koch brothers and the police unions
versus Soros and the Council on Foreign Relations. A proxy war in our
hearts and minds between rival factions of finance capital. CLUMP
2016! Welcome to elections after the end of the world.
The world as we knew it is over, and these are the
morbid symptoms of its aftermath. This is the only way to understand
the colossal mindfuck called the 2016 presidential election.
Every four years the USA and the world at large
consent to lower all levels of intelligence in order to discuss the
presidential elections. Mere resistance is futile. Like a
retrovirus, the machine assimilates all attempts to analyze it. The
election inserts itself through our psycho-spiritual membrane to
commandeer our consciousness and produce replicates of itself. To
comment is to be complicit: every critique or condemnation, including
this one, fuels the engine. Until there is no clarity, only
constituency, no politics, only polls, no ideas, only the cuisinart
of idiocy into which all noble and creative participation is fed.
All that is old
news. But this time
around, a qualitative leap has been taken into a new dimension of
delirium and degeneracy. Trump makes Dubya look disciplined. Hillary
makes her husband look humane. At some point each of us has paused
and pondered, is
this really taking place?
We´re in free-fall. There´s no way out of this election, no exit
strategy. The light at the end of the tunnel is a TV with endless
channels and no choices.
The complaint that “the media is destroying the
election” is redundant and becomes resentful. Its plaintiffs
equivocate, swishing the bitter medicine around in their mouths,
instead of swallowing it: the media didn’t destroy this election,
they created it! How else would we even know it was happening? It’s
all about publicity, and there is no such thing as bad publicity. “It
may not be good for America, but its damn good for CBS.”
As the impossible contradictions of imperial
democracy unravel, greater and greater advertising is needed to keep
up consumer confidence. That’s why they had to start promoting this
one years in advance. Just like all useless or dangerous commodities
need extra advertising, so the cost of an election is inversely
proportionate to its content. The media really pulled out all the
stops on this one! They even risked putting the crumbs of socialism
on the table in last-ditch effort to arouse the voters’ appetites.
They are the high voltage pouring into the tortured corpse of
democracy. The candidates are the monsters, and we are all cast
together as Dr. Frankenstein.
Aside from this screenplay, there are some notable
curiosities in the campaign cabinet, which deserve a spotlight.
(1) When all
the celebrities, up
to the
President himself,
have to go on TV to say “your vote counts,” you know subliminally
that something is suspicious. Greg
Palast has
painstakingly chronicled the “lynching by laptop,” and other
preferred methods of rigging “the best democracy money can buy.”
This is the most important story about this election. If your vote
counts, then for how much? And who counts it? And if you study this
seriously, then you have to answer. Your vote counts an average
of 6/7 unless you’re
white, and it is counted by such trusted defenders of democracy as
the Diebold
corporation. 6/7 may
be a step forward from 3/5,
but the technical integrity of the electoral apparatus may have
actually regressed since the days of Jim Crow.
(2) Over the course of the last few decades,
elections became inseparable from television. Now they have become
indistinguishable. It’s not only metaphor, but also concrete
political economy. It’s one long infomercial for empire, alongside
a sitcom about its indecent demise. At least since Bush and Survivor,
the US election has been a reality TV show. So it is no surprise at
all, and in retrospect it seems inevitable, that a reality TV show
host would eventually contend to be commander in chief. This explains
the ease with which Trump trounced his rivals for supremacy in the
society of the spectacle. He is playing home field. They are
pretending not to be charlatans, he only has to be himself. Trump is
a rabid attack dog, whose leash the Clintons let loose to scare us
into their neoliberal protection racket. It was a dangerous gamble
and it has had uncontrollable consequences. He now has enough lead to
turn on and maim his masters. He has mobilized centuries of racist
heritage, whose primed constituency is the impoverished rust belt.
(3) Bernie Sanders rewrote the rhythm and the
lyrics of the campaign trail, opening tactical and ideological
windows, which had been long barred shut and believed forgotten.
Predictably, he dropped the beat. With noble exceptions, his
followers fell in lockstep with the Democratic Party drummer. His
whole purpose has been reduced to promoting the Party and its
platform. Unpredictably,
the specter of socialism has been unleashed.
(4) We finally learned why the Democratic Party
never contested the stolen elections of 2000 and 2004. Voter
suppression works for them too! Their top leadership prefers a
Republican president to a rupture in their machine. Fascism is safer
than socialism as far as the financiers are concerned.
***
***
Only US citizens get a vote, but the whole world
is watching. This election holds the planet captive with screens,
ransomed with dollars backed by military bases. The outcome of this
election is likely to affect those outside the borders of the US even
more than those within them. So I’m writing from Caracas with love,
to beg the people in the country of my birth to see this election
from an international perspective.
Who should Palestinians prefer, who should Libyans
like, where should Syrians stand? Who should Hondurans and Haitians
hurrah? Who should China cheer, who should Russia revere, who should
Brazilians beware, who has South Africa scared, and why does India
care? The answers aren’t easy, they’re sleazy and greedy, and old
and cold – just like the candidates, packaged and sold.
We are not the world. It’s a big world after
all. This land isn’t my land, it isn’t your land, and it wasn’t
made for you and me. So I’d like to share a true story from South
America, and the country from which I’m writing. We have something
important to learn about elections from Venezuela.
In what seems like ancient history here, but which
ended only a few decades ago, the ruling political parties in
Venezuela made an agreement. Their leaders signed
a pact in a fancy
building called Punto Fijo, agreeing that they would share power by
rotating rulers alternatively every election cycle. They would
provide a pretense of participation and rivalry, and promise each
other a common purpose of corruption and control. This went on for
decades. Sound familiar?
In 1999, Hugo Chavez ran for president on a
radical platform: he wanted to call a constituent assembly to rewrite
the Venezuelan constitution. He was elected in a landslide. The Pact
of Punto Fijo and the two-party system bit the dust. Chavez went on
to win over a dozen elections before his death. Since then, in less
than twenty years, the Venezuelan state has been transformed via the
ballot box.
Of course, a full-scale media war has been
unleashed to make you fear and/or hate the names of Chavez and the
Bolivarian government. Obama has decreed Venezuela to be a threat to
national security. You better wonder why. But don’t believe me:
read and review the data on health, education, housing and poverty in
Venezuela over the last twenty years, from the United Nations, the
FAO, or even the World Bank. Listen to what Jimmy Carter says about
their electoral system. Read the corrections section of the New York
Times. Think outside the box that sold you the bailout and the war on
terror.
Venezuela is so demonized by Democrats and
Republicans precisely because it is a democracy and a republic –
not the bogeyman of communist conspiracy, but the precarious promise
of a peaceful revolution. John F Kennedy insisted that those who make
this revolution impossible, make another one inevitable.
This election is a global bait and switch to
immobilize us, to keep us guessing and away from grasping. Our only
consolation is that it’s over at last. The only thing truly at
stake is finding the stake that we need to drive through the heart of
this two headed monster. “Its after the end of the world,” Sun Ra
sang, “don’t you know that yet?” We are witness and warden to
the birth of a new world. It’s time for a constituent assembly and
a constitutional convention.